* Derek Fountain (derekfountain@yahoo.co.uk) [030131 22:29]: ->> ->What will that mean for compatibility with 8.1? Will 8.2 RPMs work on ->> 8.1? ->> ->> Most likely not. But some 8.1 pkgs could very work on 8.2. -> ->So anyone wanting to produce "current SuSE RPMs" of their product needs to ->make 7.3, 8.0, 8.1 and 8.2 versions? Shawn Gordon was right. This is a ->ridiculous situation. -> ->I have a Qt application nearing completion, and was going to release it under ->the GPL. Even doing "just SuSE" RPMs is looking like more trouble than it's ->worth. :o( Well, Redhat 8.0 already uses Glibc 2.3. You should see the pain that alot of the RH users on the Codeweavers list went through. I see no difference in Windows packages requiring XP or 2k to run along with the fact that a lot of OSX 10.1 software won't run on 10.2 such as Safari which requires 10.2. *shrug* -- Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@whack.org Tell me what you believe.. I'll tell you what you should see.