On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Richard Brown <RBrownCCB@opensuse.org> wrote:
On 19 November 2015 at 21:59, John Andersen <jsamyth@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/19/2015 09:06 AM, Greg Freemyer wrote:
Less than 25% of Leap comes from SLES 12 (SP1). That portion should be the quality you imply. That is the core infrastructure, systemd, etc.
Then why was Leap created? There can't be much in the way of cost savings involved here.
Because it's a good idea? Because that's still 25% of the packages which are being taken care of by SUSE without anyone else needing to worry about?
Also, How are you measuring this percentage? Simply number of rpms? Lines of code? What exactly?
I think he's quoting source packages - but the way he's quoting it is a little disingenuous - Leap is approximately 4x larger (in terms of packages) than SLES
So SLES packages being 25% of Leap represents a pretty high percentage of the packages that could be available from SLES ;)
I didn't mean to be "disingenuous" and yes, 25% by number of packages. About 1500 packages came from SLES out of 7829 packages in Leap. Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org