![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/cabdbf4d350ab6a15265803acab1634d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 02/19/2015 10:51 AM, Joe Zappa wrote:
Bingo. Anyone who has worked with done their own enlargements in a darkroom with film would consider deleting RAW files and keeping JPGs to be as foolish as burning your negatives, while keeping the small contact prints from a proff sheet.
That is a very goo way of putting it. The RAW files contain 12, 14, sometimes more, bit of information, whereas JPEGs only contain 8 bits. There is more metadata and what amounts to 'phase' information in RAW files. It much easier to do things like white balance, colour correction, when you have more bits to work with :-) -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org