10 Sep
2010
10 Sep
'10
21:13
James Knott wrote:
Now, you tell me, what's so great about NAT, when you have sufficient addresses available to not require it? In that situation, it provides absolutely no benefit at all.
If you are in the position in which you can control all relevant network, perhaps. At one project, i had to monitor 8 different **networks, and all of them were using the same rfc1918 addresses. As i couldn't ask them to change their addresses, it was a nice job for nat. ** they were all using the addresses used in the training examples ;-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org