Ken, On Monday 03 April 2006 08:35, ken wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
Ken,
On Monday 03 April 2006 08:05, ken wrote:
Patrick Shanahan wrote: ...
But you did specifically request a reply to your address! Your address was in the Reply-to field, after all. If you want people to reply to some other address, why don't you simply put that address in your Reply-to field? Isn't that what it's there for? That's what I've always used it for.
Your mailer is hallucinating. There was no Reply-To field in Patrick's message.
...
Randall Schulz
No, my mailer isn't hallucinating. Because I wanted replies to my post to go to the list, I put the list address in the Reply-to field. (Makes sense, yes?) The list server must have removed it.
You claimed that Patrick's mail had a Reply-To, which it does not. I obviously haven't checked them all, but I'm pretty sure none of Patrick's list postings have a Reply-To header. Randall Schulz