-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, 2018-02-27 at 13:03 +0100, stakanov wrote:
In data martedì 27 febbraio 2018 12:56:29 CET, Carlos E. R. ha scritto:
On 2018-02-27 12:21, stakanov wrote:
The system: non(!) UEFI, normal BIOS, AMD video and processor. The SSD is an OWC with 60 GB entirely dedicated to the OS, set as first system disk. The /home is separate on a different disc. So it is about /boot or not /boot?
Why?
Normally you do not need a separate boot partition. Certainly not if root is ext4. I think you need with XFS. Well this is what I thought. But as you know there is a difference between what you "think / belief / consider true" and what you know(!) to be correct ;-)
Well, I can tell you that I don't create a separate /boot when installing on ext4 :-) And I can also say that the last time I tried with XFS I failed, unless grub goes to the MBR. I don't use btrfs, but if I did I would not use separate /boot because it breaks rollback features. If I were to install using raid or lvm, then I would have my doubts, meaning I would have to check. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 42.3 x86_64 "Malachite" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlqVT+wACgkQtTMYHG2NR9UuggCgkyC2cDt+rPr83vkMaRzM4ZUm dToAnRtTYvrliKBXAlMJ2cK6gt+Dvs5u =SgTE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----