On Wednesday 31 August 2005 21:42, Daniel Secareanu wrote:
The analogy is wrong :) A message in a thread is by no means a book page, since most of the information has already been read, at least
Uhh, no.. unless you are using outlook. Then you are forced to top post. But don't worry, I really could care less how you post. I don't have to read them anymore.
once... Chronologically speaking, is like reading a resume, the most recent information is also the most relevant one... the rest is merely background information...
I'd suggest you do a search on email netiquette. I don't keep the address handy, or I'd give it to you.
Maybe this personal opinion of mine is because I have a journalism - mass communication education... and news/information for me is more relevant if it is more recent...
Ahh, good, so you write a story from the bottom up. Put the most relevant information at the bottom of the story.
But any argument is useless, it's a simple matter of personal choice/opinion and we're all free/entitled to have one, despite the fact that some people like it or not...
That's true.. -- Powered by SuSE 9.3 Kernel 2.6.11 KDE 3.4.0 Kmail 1.8 For Mondo/Mindi backup support go to http://www.mikenjane.net/~mike 9:54pm up 2 days 2:56, 3 users, load average: 2.02, 2.15, 2.27