Per Jessen wrote:
Anton Aylward wrote:
On 05/07/2014 09:21 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Some way longer:
spamd: clean message (-2.7/5.0) for cer:1000 in 57.3 seconds, 5630 spamd: clean message (-2.6/5.0) for cer:1000 in 53.2 seconds, 7839 bytes.
(see the size)
or
spamd: identified spam (6.5/5.0) for cer:1000 in 213.1 seconds, 15976538 by
At times, I got consistent processing times of 6..12 seconds each. A hundred emails would be processed in 1200 seconds, which I find intolerable - with 5% CPU load at most. The hurdle were the network test timeouts, I think.
WOW!
I process about 200 messages a day and grepping though the logs I see one at 7 seconds, two at 5 second and the rest at 1-2 seconds.
My load average over that period is less than 0.5
(It occasionally peaked when I was running the nvidia driver from nvidia! Burt that's a different matter)
This is with a single core CPU: Model name: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ Stepping: 2 CPU MHz: 1889.930 BogoMIPS: 3779.86
Yeah, the CPU is largely irrelevant
Except for people scanning excessively large emails of several megabytes :-) -- Per Jessen, Zürich (14.0°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org