Hello,
In the Message;
Subject : Re: Printer Problems and Suggestions? Message-ID : <937086a4-93d5-437b-9078-8e22bb8a23f2@accesscomm.ca> Date & Time: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 02:12:07 -0600
[DG] == Darryl Gregorash <raven@accesscomm.ca> has written:
DG> On 2024-07-29 19:25, Masaru Nomiya wrote: DG> > Hello, DG> > DG> > In the Message; DG> > DG> > Subject : Re: Printer Problems and Suggestions? DG> > Message-ID : <2142042.9o76ZdvQCi@linux64> DG> > Date & Time: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 15:10:11 +0200 DG> > DG> > [SH] == Stephan Hemeier via openSUSE Users <users@lists.opensuse.org> has written: DG> > DG> > SH> Am Montag, 29. Juli 2024, 12:56:13 CEST schrieb Masaru Nomiya: DG> > SH> > As a Japanese, I'd prefer to use Brother, but just to be safe, I DG> > SH> > installed it into Tumbleweed. I got a message like this; DG> > SH> > DG> > SH> > lpadmin: Printer drivers are deprecated and will stop DG> > SH> > working in a future version of CUPS. DG> > SH> > DG> > SH> > Environment; DG> > SH> > DG> > SH> > $ rpm -q cups DG> > SH> > cups-2.4.10-1.0.x86_64 DG> > SH> > DG> > SH> > Best Regards. DG> > DG> > SH> Maybe because using "old" libs; so you have to install in Leap DG> > SH> 15.6 also libnsl1 for scanning. DG> > SH> Leap 15.6 is using libnsl2 as standard. DG> > DG> > Do you even know what you're talking about? DG> > DG> > 1. cups does not require libnsl DG> > DG> > 2. Tumbleweed uses libnsl3 by default DG> > DG> We went through all this once before, when my scanner disappeared with DG> the upgrade to 15.6. DG> The Brother drivers use libnsl1
I know WELL that Brother MFC-L3780CDW is a multifunctional machine. Whoever suggested that you did not? I certainly didn't. You basically told Stephan Hemeier that he didn't know what he was talking about, when in fact it is you who did not: cups may not need
On 2024-07-30 05:33, Masaru Nomiya wrote: libnsl1, but the scanner drivers from Brother most certainly do. All I said to you about that was that the matter was raised some time ago, when my scanner disappeared on me after upgrading to 15.6
I've only expressed my doubts about its print driver at its core, and that's all I'm really saying about it. I don't recall seeing that here. Could you summarize please?