On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 21:13 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, 2009-12-15 at 17:11 +0100, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 23:05 +0700, Constant Brouerius van Nidek wrote:
Thanks for the information. Indeed there were three patches waiting which zypper update did not find.
What would be the danger of always doing zupper dup instead of zypper update? I know that dup seems more thorough. But perhaps that could lead to a problem?
Many... it stands for "distribution upgrade", and will change whatever you have installed with the newest package found on any of the configured repos, regardless of vendor changes.
This I understand. But as long as I (1) have 11.2 installed and (2) use repos for 11.2, what is the difference? I can only see that it will do vendor changes without asking. I see that update can use a file of allowed vendor changes, which it will then allow to be updated. So, for those vendors, update and dup would act the same? Let's pretend I made a vendor file that had all the vendors in the 11.2 repos I have enabled. Would update and dup then do basically the same thing? If there is some other subtle difference, I don't see it. -- Roger Oberholtzer OPQ Systems / Ramböll RST Ramböll Sverige AB Krukmakargatan 21 P.O. Box 17009 SE-104 62 Stockholm, Sweden Office: Int +46 10-615 60 20 Mobile: Int +46 70-815 1696 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org