* Anders Johansson (andjoh@cicada.linux-site.net) [010830 14:21]: ->Well, that's the nature of the GPL. Anyone can redistribute your code under ->their own label. Agreed. But this is a branding issue. IBM, Compaq and the rest have always maintained they would push SuSE in Europe, RH in the U.S. and TurboLinux in Asia... ->But if SuSE did the work, it's only fair to assume they're a lot more ->competent, and are going to make a killing at the services needed to maintain ->the systems. Yes..but how can one make a killing in PS if your software isn't what's installed? Should SuSE ever want to do PS in the states they should support RH? This makes no sense. It keeps their PS efforts to Europe. ->BTW. Someone I talked to at IBM said that SuSE on 390 wasn't very good. They ->preferred TurboLinux or Caldera. Has anyone here actually used 'zSeries' with ->linux, and can comment? Sounds like personal bias of the person at IBM you talk to...it's the same code. -- Ben Rosenberg mailto:ben@whack.org cat CE|ME|NT|XP > /dev/null