I've been running the 2.6.8.1 kernel for quite awhile now. No problems that I see. Methinks you doth protest too much... :-)
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 20:04, Fred Miller wrote:
And have a vast number of people bashing SUSE because of an "ancient" kernel?
I wouldn't!! STABILITY my friend - that IS what most of us want and MUST have! I don't need grief, like we have now, for example getting XCDRoast to allow users to burn a CD, and getting a number of hardware to work properly. I'm not picking on SUSE, you should know that by now.
I've been running the 2.6.8.1 kernel for quite awhile now. No problems
Now that is encouraging......... -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin * Bertin, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 (936) 715-9333 www.rankin-bertin.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Marshall" <bmarsh@bmarsh.com> To: "SLE" <suse-linux-e@suse.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 8:18 PM Subject: Re: [SLE] 9.2 and BAD kernel. that I
see. Methinks you doth protest too much... :-)
--
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -+
+ Bruce S. Marshall bmarsh@bmarsh.com Bellaire, MI 10/12/04 21:17 +
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -+
"I may be fat but you're ugly, and I can lose weight."
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com