On 9/18/20 11:37 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
Now, I had no idea such tool even existed, and I am not at all suggesting that we change anything in our ISOs because of it.
It apparently is a quite famous image writing tool for Windows, and live ISOs of other distros apparently work well with it, but let's live this aside for now.
It is.... I don't use windows at all, but I have used rufus in the times that I do and I'd wager that if you took a current poll of all windows users likely to try Linux in the next year and what tool they would use to write an image to a usb-stick, the result would likely be more than 50% planned on using rufus. Which brings us back to your first paragraph above. If we can fix the iso so that it is compatible with this tool -- that would be the optimal solution. I have no clue what our .iso has that causes the problem, but if you can identify that and it isn't much effort to fix -- it would be worth it. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.