On 05/12/2013 03:02 PM, Anton Aylward wrote:
Andrea Turrini said the following on 05/12/2013 08:25 AM:
And will this next release land in oS 12.3 as official update? Can you ensure this?
I'm unclear what you're asking.
It is simple: will there be an official update (i.e., a package in openSUSE-12.3-Update repository) for systemd that prevents/solves the current status, i.e., the creation without removal of these [/var]/tmp/systemd-private-* directories? Or in other words, if this problem has been solved by systemd-N with N strictly greater than 195, will systemd-195 be replaced by systemd-N via an official update or will changes in systemd-N be backported to systemd-195 via an official update? My impression is that the current status will stand until oS 12.3 goes out of support, and then no one will care about the problem.
One 12.2 I have (according to zypper info)
Repository: openSUSE-12.2-Update Name: systemd Version: 44-10.8.1 Arch: i586 Vendor: openSUSE Installed: Yes Status: up-to-date
and on 12.3
Repository: openSUSE-12.3-Update Name: systemd Version: 195-13.25.1 Arch: i586 Vendor: openSUSE Installed: Yes Status: up-to-date
WOW! What a difference!
So? they are just numbers; nothing prevents the version to be increased by 1 just for fixing a typo.
And please note that I ma using the update repositories.
Me too, but I just see: ori@orodruin:~> zypper se -s --match-exact systemd Verbosity: 2 Non-option program arguments: 'systemd' Initializing Target Loading repository data... Reading installed packages... Force resolution: No S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository --+---------+------------+-------------+--------+--------------------- i | systemd | package | 195-13.25.1 | x86_64 | openSUSE-12.3-Update v | systemd | package | 195-13.18.1 | x86_64 | openSUSE-12.3-Update v | systemd | package | 195-13.14.1 | x86_64 | openSUSE-12.3-Update v | systemd | package | 195-13.11.1 | x86_64 | openSUSE-12.3-Oss v | systemd | package | 195-13.25.1 | i586 | openSUSE-12.3-Update v | systemd | package | 195-13.18.1 | i586 | openSUSE-12.3-Update v | systemd | package | 195-13.14.1 | i586 | openSUSE-12.3-Update v | systemd | package | 195-13.11.1 | i586 | openSUSE-12.3-Oss | systemd | srcpackage | 195-13.25.1 | noarch | openSUSE-12.3-Update | systemd | srcpackage | 195-13.18.1 | noarch | openSUSE-12.3-Update | systemd | srcpackage | 195-13.14.1 | noarch | openSUSE-12.3-Update
Perhaps Cristian can tell up more about what's going on 'upstream',
Why should I care about upstream if problems are downstream? If I would report this problem upstream, probably it will be closed as INVALID since it seems that they have already fixed it in a later version, or because downstream is using a different setup not supported by upstream ([/var]/tmp on disk instead of on RAM), but such version will not be made available officially for oS 12.3.
This is a very general list for Suse; there are specific ones for things like the kernel and other areas of development; specific ones like factory, kde, gnome ... See https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_lists
Currently I am subscribed to this, factory, translation, kde, project, and possibly some other. Since I do not see an opensuse-systemd list, and we are talking about oS 12.3 and not factory, opensuse is the only list that is OK for this discussion (except for opensuse-offtopic, but this is not an offtopic). Or am I missing the correct list? Best, Andrea -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org