On 08-Sep-98 Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
Until it hits ftp.kernel.org, 2.2.0 is as real as Santa Claus as far as I'm concerned. There are still too many problems with 2.1.x to be
Problem is that 6.0 will be sold until jan/feb 1999. If 2.2 is out in september, that will make œ a year on an old kernel line. Not a good selling point.
But perhaps as you point out, there could be two kernels.
That's ASSUMING that 2.2.x is that close to release ========================================================================= * <A HREF="http://benham.net/index.html"><A HREF="http://benham.net/index.html</A">http://benham.net/index.html</A</A>> * * -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------* * Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 * * <gecko@benham.net> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++* * * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- * * Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ * * <gecko@debian.org> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ * * -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------* ========================================================================= - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e