On 07/01/2016 04:56 PM, Paul Groves wrote:
On 01/07/16 18:30, Chuck Payne wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Jan Ritzerfeld <suse@mailinglists.jan.ritzerfeld.org> wrote:
Hi, has anyone found a program that can rip dvds in full quality? (Like magic dvd ripper in windows) [...] The "or backup DVD to hard drive without any loss of quality." should be
Am Freitag, 1. Juli 2016, 14:12:01 schrieb Paul Groves: possible by "dvdbackup -M" after installing it from http://packman.links2linux.org/package/dvdbackup/
Gruß Jan -- If you consult enough experts, you can confirm any opinion.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org
Handbrake works great.
I tried handbrake. The videos are covered in lines that look like interlacing. The DVDs play fine in VLC though
I've used handbrake and had both success and failures with it. like so much of Linux it gives you and immense amount of control over what you are doing and that in turn assumes that (a) you understand not only what you are doing and can express what you are trying to achieve, (b) you understand the underlying technology and the ways it can be and is being manipulated by the various tools available to you and the various different things that they are trying to achieve and also (d) you are willing to put the effort into learning how to manipulating all those parameters, understand their effects and interactions and are willing to do it on every use. My jig is more still photography than video, but its clear to me that there is a difference between, on the one hand, the point-and-shoot types out there (even if they do have a $5,000 Canon/Nikon kit) who rely on the various 'artistic' settings on the camera, and on the other the professionals (or those aspiring to be) who shoot RAW and devote their time to doing the transformation under their own control using Adobe's Camera Raw and/or Photoshop (or Darktable for Linux), with its myriad of controls and settings and the resulting output. The former requires no skill, no understanding; the latter requires a lot and even the 'experts' admit they have more to learn and need more experience. Perhaps you do need to spend 10,000 hours working with any piece of technology or toolset. I'm not sure; I think that if its a technology that uses 'patterns' rather than a 'sui generis' approach and you learn what is going on 'under the hood' that can save a lot of time. Its certainly the case with photography. I've also found it to be the case with many aspects of Linux-based computing. At this point I'd like to drag out the old quotation: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/murphy/why-many-mcses-wont-learn-linux/1137 I've used handbrake, at least in its GUI form where the various settings are more viable than in the CLI form :-) After a few (!) hours of experimentation I found a setting that worked with the DVD I was ripping so that I could view it on my tablet. I then recorded that setting for future use. That setting worked with some other DVDs nicely. But then I came across some DVDs where it didn't work. Some of those I found setting that worked to varying degrees of satisfaction but some I never got good results with.
From this I conclude that there isn’t a high degree of standardization between video DVDs produced by different methods.
There is in my DatabaseOfDotSigQuotes: The master worries about the work, and the apprentice worries about the tools. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org