On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 21:16:46 ellanios82 wrote:
On 01/06/2013 11:27 AM, George Olson wrote:
Also, TB never had a problem connecting, while kmail2 did. So I
finally gave up on kmail and am going back to TB - it is just easier to not have the headache. Kmail works, but there is still some development it needs to make it more user-friendly. At least that is my opinion. Some people swear by kmail2, but I prefer TB.
_____________
- i agree . . . just one persons idea : KDE is losing its way : too much Bloat - have recently used "Xfce" desktop . . . excellent . . . much "Lighter"
best regards
Thanks for the feedback, folks. I prefer KMail (the original) to TB, but would prefer to stay away from KMail 2 at this stage. Has anyone successfully installed (or built) KMail v1.x.x on the KDE 4.9.x or 4.10.x? -- ========================================================================== Rodney Baker VK5ZTV rodney.baker@iinet.net.au ========================================================================== -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org