Am Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 14:58:50 schrieb Larry Stotler:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Sven Burmeister <sven.burmeister@gmx.net> wrote:
Why do I have to prove it? The fact that kde3 has not been forked yet shows that the majority is not on kde3's site and hence it is you who has to prove the claim that "many" are on kde3's site
It's more because mostly non developers are the ones that want to see KDE3 continue, myself included.
Thanks! "Mostly", so were are those developers, there must be a few.
I'm honestly amazed at this whole flame. So many are pushing KDE4 because it's so great to them, and they feel that anyone who doesn't see it's greatness is just mistaken. This has gotten to an almost religous fever and it's just plain silly.
Indeed! Yet you fail to see that those using KDE4 are not arguing that KDE3 is shite, which would be silly. They just disagree with the claim that KDE4 is bad, which is not silly at all. If people would just stick to "I like KDE3" without adding "KDE4 is just about bling and hence useless and many others (if not the majority) think so too", they would not be told that their claims are just too extreme to be true. It is absolutely not silly to tell people who claim: KDE4 is only about bling and hence useless!, that they are wrong. And to stand firm on that opinion is not religious but sensible. Or would one have to agree with those that tell KDE4 is bad in order not to be religious? I guess that arguments are lacking and hence one tries to pull the ideology/religion bat on those that like KDE4. Just read the thread and how often people tell you and the others: If you like KDE3, go on using it, it's your choice, your freedom. Sven -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org