On 2009/10/02 20:17 (GMT+0200) <jdd-gmane> composed:
I don't know why you want to use OS/2 boot loader
Which is better, emacs or vim or something else? Choosing IBM Boot Manager after once learning how it works, vs. any other booting system, is a similar type of choice. On every system I have both Linux and OS/2 on, my choice for primary boot loader is IBM's Boot Manager. Grub I put only on / or /boot partitions, and never on MBR, even though I like Grub and always use it instead of Lilo. IBM BM is simple to use and effective in operation, essentially a (logically speaking) easy to configure chainloader. It's main drawback is its requirement of exclusive use of a primary partition, though that need not be on the first BIOS HD. -- " A patriot without religion . . . is as great a paradox, as an honest man without the fear of God. . . . 2nd U.S. President, John Adams Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org