James Knott pecked at the keyboard and wrote:
Bogdan Cristea wrote:
On Thursday 03 July 2008 07:43:01 John Andersen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Anton Moiseev <benderamp@gmail.com> wrote:
It's a matter of taste, really. Konqueror isn't likely to go away anytime soon, so >>choose what you prefer
I was afraid to see dolphin replace konq with less features
Konqueror is not compenig with dolphin.
To hell it isn't. Dolphin has all but pushed Kong off the desktop in KDE4. Its almost impossible to find the filemanager part of Kong in KDE4.
-- ----------JSA--------- "Ubuntu" is an African word meaning "Suse is too hard for me".
Just wondering: Dolphin has the tagging facility? (browse using several tags like in Konqueror).
I miss also the embedded viewer. In both Dolphin and Konqueror when I click on a text file xemacs is used to open that file (and it seems significantly slower than the embedded viewer)
This is another KDE4 "improvement". Don't you just love it when developers get so full of themselves, that everything they produce is a work of genius?
I think they are succeeding in making it like Vista, including the dog slow part. Oh and with the updates it is getting better ( if you look past the slow part that is ) but one still cannot add an icon to the desktop or taskbar when using the better/faster classic app launcher. new <> improved -- Ken Schneider SuSe since Version 5.2, June 1998 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org