Anders Johansson wrote:
On Saturday 05 January 2008 23:32:39 Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Strange how all of them were also part of the "Bush stole the election" pack of idiots, too (despite the fact that EVERY SINGLE RECOUNT -- Including the unofficial one done by left-wing newspaper and magazine staffers...all had counts favoring Bush).
Well, that's not entirely true
http://www.aei.org/docLib/20040526_KeatingPaper.pdf
but enough of this. Let's get back on topic
The paper doesn't say that Bush stole the election. It says that for various technical problems, that when an automatic balot counter tabulates votes, each ballot has around 2% chance of not being counted. It also says that a lot of people who voted were too stupid to figure out how to make a mark or punch a hole in their ballot (and in such cases, their votes DESERVE to be ignored. Really, if you can't figure out how to punch ONE AND ONLY ONE hole for a position...then you have no business being in a voting booth. Any candidate whose victory depends on incompetent voters doesn't deserve to hold office.) And the argument that Democratic-run counties were the most likely to use such machines is hardly evidence of a conspiracy by Bush and the Republican party. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org