Sat, 26 Aug 2023 08:56:54 -0400 "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@gmx.es> :
On 2023-08-13 07:59, bent fender wrote:
Sun, 13 Aug 2023 11:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Robert Webb via openSUSE Users <users@lists.opensuse.org> :
On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 12:09:56 +0200, "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@telefonica.net> wrote:
On 2023-08-13 02:32, Robert Webb via openSUSE Users wrote:
Of the three options for a successor to Leap presented in [1], none is containerized. Separately, openSUSE will also have a distribution that is a copy of the SUSE containerized distro, right?
What about "Linarite"?
The survey page [1] has a link to the Linarite description [2]. Two of its features are: - Won't use transactional updates - Won't use containers in the core of the OS, but will support running containerized workloads from ALP
I interpret that as not requiring the use of containers, but maybe I'm wrong, and some desktop apps will only be available containerized. If most of the apps are just the containerized stuff pulled from SUSE, then I don't see the point in making the OS core different.
I don't even know what containerised really means, voted for slowroll. If it has anything to do with snap then it's bye-bye anyway; snap has limitations that I'm not prepared to accept (like home cannot be a link, it has this microsuck odor).
I finally completed watching the video "There's a mountain to climb: openSUSE's response to SUSE ALP", and I did not see an explanation of Linarite or Slowroll. I may have missed it, I prefer written content.
But that WAS in a Suse writen guide about the topic, I shudda quoted it, too late now. I think it meant a roller like TW but not updated every minute like. After all except for devs a roller never meant instant updates but *a lack of release versions* as such and if the cart is not to go in front of the horse then this latter definition being closer to users rulez.