Yeh, um.. I think I was responding to the guy who was asking a kernel versions question... I haven't used 2.1.111.... yet. I might try it. I only fool with ones that offer features or items that are changes I'd be interested in. I guess I should get off my behind and check it out. I'm running on 'old one' (in developmental terms) that for the MOST part is not to misbehaved. On Sun, 26 Jul 1998, Michael Lankton wrote:
I ran 2.1.111 all night last night. I have to imagine that 2.2.x is close, 2.1.111 was nice.
Michael Johnson wrote:
There are official kernels that have been regarded as stable enough to be used by the 'masses'. There are also kernels that are 'developmental' which have new features etc that aren't regarded as perfectly stable...developmental meaning just that. Mostly these are used by hackers and programmers etc...or simply someone curious who doesn't mind playing with fire. There's plenty of information on the web about the different kernels and what features and problems are being tested and supported. One site you might want to look at is <A HREF="http://www.linuxhq.com...you"><A HREF="http://www.linuxhq.com...you</A">http://www.linuxhq.com...you</A</A>> can also browse the kernel archives, though much of the chat might be meaningless to you depending...
-- ==================================================================== Michael Lankton <A HREF="http://tasteslikechicken.ml.org"><A HREF="http://tasteslikechicken.ml.org</A">http://tasteslikechicken.ml.org</A</A>> ==================================================================== - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
-M One is most dishonest towards one's God; he is not _permitted_ to sin. mail: mjohnson@pop3.aebc.com - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e