On 10/24/06, Carlos E. R. <robin.listas@telefonica.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
The Tuesday 2006-10-24 at 08:37 +0530, Duff Mckagan wrote:
Yes. I agree that the needful was done. Action was taken indeed. But still, Ed McCanless' post was tagged as SPAM.
I guess they have a new filter now. If the post doesn't have the word SuSE, then its tagged as SPAM.
The Bayes database was retrained. His email probably matched. Let me see... yes, that is:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0tests=BAYES_95, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Flag: YES
The Bayes database is not yet trained perfectly. It will happen again, I'm
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.4 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_95, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Level: ****** X-Spam-Flag: YES This thing is quite abysmal. What does it mean? Lol..is it even worth explaining at all? I am curious anyways... -- http://mckagan.googlepages.com