James Knott wrote:
Anders Johansson wrote:
Maybe you're not really listening to yourself, but that is exactly what you're saying. "With IPv6, I don't have to open up multiple ports in the firewall to get to internal machines, everything is directly available".
I suspect you're misreading something. Our point is that with NAT, when you want to access multiple computers with the same protocol, you have to resort to non-standard ports or ssh relaying.
And _that_ is the crux of "NAT is broken in a number of ways"? James, I guess it's matter of wording, but to me the above doesn't mean broken, at worst it's a very slight disadvantage. Like I started out saying, I think that NAT, despite rumours of "being broken in a number of ways", works remarkably well. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (13.8°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org