<font size=3>I don't understand your claim that there can be no such thing as WYSIWYG editors. Don't lots of people use them under Windose? Isn't Composer WYSIWYG? As for editing code by hand, that's something I do to fine tune and clean up my code. I believe people use an approach that reflects the sate of the development tools at the time they start the learning curve. The more grizzled gurus of HTML insist that "you have to do it by hand." The newbies don't even want to look at code. <br> <br> I'm somewhere in the middle.<br> <br> Ron Lavoie<br> <br> At 03:32 98-09-08 , you wrote:<br>
<br> +----- On Mon, 07 Sep 1998 19:03:36 EDT, Ron Lavoie writes:<br> | Are there any WYSIWYG HTML editors for Linux? I'm getting very tired of W95<br> | crashing in the middle of my work. I'd really like something with a<br> | site/project view and more flexibility than Netscape Composer. I don't<br> | want to spend all my development time struggling with code in emacs, either.<br> <br> The very nature of HTML means that there can be no WYSIWYG editors. <br> IMHO if you are struggling in emacs or vi or pico then it probably <br> means that you aren't structuring your code, machines understand <br> unstructured code but people don't.<br> <br> /Michael<br> </font>