??----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, 2017-11-16 at 13:09 -0000, Radule Šoškić wrote:
On 11/09/2017 05:57 AM, Basil Chupin wrote:
On 09/11/17 09:01, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 11/07/2017 08:33 AM, ellanios82 wrote:
Dear Chairman Brown ,
Can we now please re-instate Linda ? Motion seconded.
Plus 1 ... to the power of n.
BC
But, 1 to the power of n is still 1. :-)
Now, seriously.
My plus 1.
I think banning Linda was a wrong move.
I am on this list for very loong time. Mostly "listening", rarely asking or answering. Writing in English is hard to me and always takes a lot of time, so I mostly wait for others to ask or answer. For all these years, I always percieved this list's purpose was not just for asking/giving help, but also, in cases, for expressing opinions on important topics regarding (open)SUSE from user perspective. Opinions have their value. Communicating opinions is a kind of help in a sense. At least, it was helpful to *me* to learn what others think on subjects that I am interested in. Of course, I felt free to ignore subjects that were out of my interest.
Yes, I agree.
So, I feel free to express my oppinion that involvment of board members/chair in (kind of) moderation, banning individual list members or even treathening of terminating the whole mailing list look like some sort of micromanaging. I would expect governance level to keep "noses in" but "hands out". Than again, of course, I might be wrong.
I also agree. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 42.2 x86_64 "Malachite" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAloNnJcACgkQtTMYHG2NR9VNSACdFCuJNZ/BbcAnKMRJyXBDcisO K0EAnRwf/Lbyfm4jn3kfcs99kBQVqixH =YSz6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----