On Sunday 14 Mar 2010 14:18:40 Carlos E. R. wrote:
On Sunday, 2010-03-14 at 12:40 -0000, Peter Nikolic wrote:
and this device by name thing is well bin fodder .
Only in your eyes. Others regard it as a welcome help to get stable device names.
Now your taking the pith thats a FACT if they are stable why are there so many complaints about names and allocations that change
Device names are not stable. In my machine one day sda is /dev/sda, another it is /dev/sdd. It depends on the external disks being powered up or not. If I used such names in fstab my machine would not boot.
If your devices do not change, you are just lucky.
this device by name thing can we please get rid of this deranged junk ,
It's neither deranged nor junk.
It IS both deranged and junk
It is not. Go complain to the hardware manufacturers and developpers, not here. And you'd better be able to propose a better piece of code.
That is so simple it is untrue we go back to the days of sanity before people started faffing around forcing IDE to be SCSI it worked very well if you connected a drive to the IDE0 port it was either hda or hdb depending on wether it was the master or slave drive
Who defines which port is ide1 or sata1?
Look at the mother board they ARE Marked 0and 1 or 1 and 2 and if your Mobo is not i suggest you send it back as it obviously missed a silk screen process
And how do you read those labels in software? Perhaps you propose the motherboard has a camera pointing at the cables, so that the kernel can read them and adapt the names "correctly"?
Well if the interface is the first one on the chip then one would expect the software to CORRECTLY identify it as such no strange witch craft there -- Powered by openSUSE 11.2 Milestone 2 (x86_64) Kernel: 2.6.30-rc6-git3-4- default KDE: 4.2.86 (KDE 4.2.86 (KDE 4.3 >= 20090514)) "release 1" 16:55 up 50 days 7:38, 2 users, load average: 0.80, 0.45, 0.33