On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 17:57, Fred A. Miller wrote:
From: ROBERT X. CRINGELY(R): "Notes from the Field" InfoWorld.com, Monday, February 3, 2003
"When SCO, SuSE, Connectiva, and TurboLinux banded together to form UnitedLinux, the pretense was that the companies would each contribute to the development of an operating system. But apparently SCO is not adding to the technical development of UnitedLinux software. Rather, it is merely sending SuSE a check every month, with which the latter is getting extra research dirt beneath its nails. The word is that SCO is paying its way out of contributing development so it can concentrate on core competencies."
Does it matter? I run an operating environment based on its qualities. Why should I care who wrote it? Besides, the premise is not merely wrong, it's clinically insane. "SCO paying its way out of contributing development"??? Money->salaries->development resources!