XDDDDDDDD No es que se te incordie con menudencias, es que algunos tomamos como incordio el uso de titulares pasmosos. Espero que este debate quede zanjado. Lo que yo entiendo leyendo el mensaje es otra cosa, simplemente trasladar las paquetes non-oss a repos online, sacándolos del medio físico de instalación. Los paquetes seguirían estando disponibles, pero el EULA de instalación sería más amigable para con los usuarios-talibán del OS. En mi opinión es simplemente un cambio de ubicación de los paquetes. (Espero que este sí vaya a a la lista) 2008/9/26 Carlos E. R. <carlos.e.r@opensuse.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Ya, es posible que el título no sea totalmente exacto, pero la propuesta exacta va ahí abajo; la leeis, y no me incordeis con menudencias >:-)
- -- Saludos Carlos E.R.
- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:09:58 +0200 From: Michael Loeffler <...@novell.com> To: opensuse-factory@opensuse.org Subject: [opensuse-factory] non-oss software on our media?
Hi,
we discussed already once [1] the situation with proprietary software on our distribution. We agreed on the list and in an IRC project meeting that it's not nice but is very convenient for many users and should stay therefor on media.
I'm opening the discussion again as with that we never will achieve a user friendly licence as already copying of our software on DVD is not allowed and even some mirrors have an issue with this licence. We receive on a regular base inquiries in this regards and bad press [2].
Here is our proposal for new discussion.
*Ship any media of openSUSE with open source software and proprietary software which allows redistribution (eg. firmware), for details [3].
*Add during installation automatically an online repo with the non-OSS stuff and install per default flashplayer (5MB) and the fluendo plug-in (210K) for mp3.
This would allow us to offer a user friendly end user licence agreement (EULA) and would remove the cause of bad press and angry users reading the EULA really carefully.
Some background info: - - survey of usage of proprietary[4] software showed that only flashplayer and acroread really are used by a majority of users (Java is not an issue anymore as we ship with 11.1 openJDK) - - with the distribution of 90%+ of broadband access amongst our users flashplayer via online repo shouldn't be a problem. And without internet access flashplayer won't be an issue for anybody. - - For acroread we're sure that the open source alternatives (kpdf, evince, okular) are at same level with acroread. The only drawback we're aware of is the missing functionality PDF Forms offers today.
We're asking for your buy-in for having a more friendly EULA, to make the distribution of openSUSE easier and get the software in more hands.
BTW: we'll replace the proprietary agfa-fonts with the open source alternative Liberation fonts with openSUSE 11.1.
Best Michael
[1] http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2007-07/msg00050.html [2] http://lwn.net/Articles/283555/ [3] http://en.opensuse.org/Non_oss_software [4] http://files.opensuse.org/opensuse/en/c/ce/SurveySummary_proprietary_softwar...
- -- Michael Löffler, Product Management SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nürnberg - AG Nürnberg - HRB 16746 - GF: Markus Rex - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkjdOJgACgkQtTMYHG2NR9X4xgCgh1bJ18R+PpwXXOPd9ZgJFTuS ky8AnifxqzeOKR2eDcnBrKql3P1RQGwk =EvCY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Para dar de baja la suscripción, mande un mensaje a: opensuse-es+unsubscribe@opensuse.org Para obtener el resto de direcciones-comando, mande un mensaje a: opensuse-es+help@opensuse.org