On 08/17/2011 03:26 PM, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am 15.08.2011 21:06, schrieb Larry Finger:
The purpose of this OBD is to test the open bugs reported for oS 11.4 to see which of them are still affecting 12.1.
I just had a look at http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Open-Bugs-Day
and all three of the steps under part 2 of "How" seem to be wrong in the context of retesting 11.4 bugs
2.1 would loose the information, that the bug is still in 11.4. Bugzilla can not have one bug for multiple versions - this is a known shortcoming of bugzilla. Either we could create a clone of the bug or we accept it, as nobody fixed it til now, so chances might be low that it would be fixed for 11.4.
2.2 is similar as 2.1 but cloning is not good here. Maybe best would be to just add the text "This has been fixed in 12.1." while leaving the status for 11.4 (unless it was also fixed there)
2.3 is worst as it suggests that 11.4 was out of support which is completely wrong. If it is hard to reproduce, maybe setting the bug to NEEDINFO from reporter, asking if he can still reproduce it on current 12.1 would be best.
Opinions? Please discuss...
In section 2.1, I favor cloning the bug and marking the clone for 12.1 MS4. I agree with your solution to 2.2. The new text should be sufficient. As section 2.3 differs in that one can not say if the bug has been fixed or not, I think setting NEEDINFO from the original reporter along with a request to test 12.1 makes sense. Larry -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-testing+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-testing+help@opensuse.org