Hello! File /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstresindvd.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.22.9-3.1.x86_64 (Repository principale (OSS)) conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-orig-addon-1.22.6-33.2.x86_64 (@System) File /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstsiren.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.22.9-3.1.x86_64 (Repository principale (OSS)) conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-orig-addon-1.22.6-33.2.x86_64 (@System) How should I avoid to receive this kind of warnings during the update process? sudo zypper lr -E -P # | Alias | Name | Enabled | GPG Check | Refresh | Priority ---+----------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+---------+-----------+---------+--------- 3 | Packman | Packman | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 80 6 | download.opensuse.org-tumbleweed | Repository principale degli aggiornamenti | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 90 1 | Google_Chrome_repository | Google_Chrome_repository | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99 2 | Hamradio | Hamradio | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99 4 | download.opensuse.org-non-oss | Repository principale (NON-OSS) | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99 5 | download.opensuse.org-oss | Repository principale (OSS) | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99 15 | nordvpn | nordvpn | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99 20 | skype-stable | skype (stable) | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99 I wish to keep Packman at higher priority, now I don't know what OSS Vs. @System means in the warning. Could you please be so kind to explain? Thanks! -- Marco Calistri Build: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20240209 Kernel: 6.7.2-1-default - XFCE: (4.18.3) Uptime: 10:00:01 up 5 days 19:50, 1 user, carico medio: 1,90, 2,46, 1,91
For a start, you are using an obsolete list e-mail which has been changed long ago. For those who do filtering of incoming mails it may end up in the wrong bucket. On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 4:05 PM Marco Calistri <PY1ZRJ@outlook.com> wrote:
Hello!
File /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstresindvd.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.22.9-3.1.x86_64 (Repository principale (OSS)) conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-orig-addon-1.22.6-33.2.x86_64 (@System)
File /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstsiren.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.22.9-3.1.x86_64 (Repository principale (OSS)) conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-orig-addon-1.22.6-33.2.x86_64 (@System)
How should I avoid to receive this kind of warnings during the update process?
You cannot. It is outside of your control. You can only resolve this problem by deciding to remove (or not install) one of conflicting packages.
sudo zypper lr -E -P # | Alias | Name | Enabled | GPG Check | Refresh | Priority ---+----------------------------------+-------------------------------------------+---------+-----------+---------+--------- 3 | Packman | Packman | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 80 6 | download.opensuse.org-tumbleweed | Repository principale degli aggiornamenti | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 90 1 | Google_Chrome_repository | Google_Chrome_repository | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99 2 | Hamradio | Hamradio | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99 4 | download.opensuse.org-non-oss | Repository principale (NON-OSS) | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99 5 | download.opensuse.org-oss | Repository principale (OSS) | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99 15 | nordvpn | nordvpn | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99 20 | skype-stable | skype (stable) | Sì | (r ) Sì | Sì | 99
I wish to keep Packman at higher priority,
Which is irrelevant to this error.
now I don't know what OSS
It is the repository name that *you* assigned. So I expect that *you* should know what this repository name refers to.
Vs. @System means in the warning.
@System refers to the packages currently installed. The exact package version which is installed is not provided by any configured and enabled repository, otherwise you would get the name of such repository.
Could you please be so kind to explain?
Thanks!
-- Marco Calistri Build: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20240209 Kernel: 6.7.2-1-default - XFCE: (4.18.3) Uptime: 10:00:01 up 5 days 19:50, 1 user, carico medio: 1,90, 2,46, 1,91
On 2024-02-12 14:30, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
For a start, you are using an obsolete list e-mail which has been changed long ago. For those who do filtering of incoming mails it may end up in the wrong bucket.
Use: List-Id: Support and discussion of the openSUSE distributions <support.lists.opensuse.org> ;-) Yeah, my filters list both the old and new addresses, though. ... -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 15.5 (Laicolasse))
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 19:34:57 +0100, "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@telefonica.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-12 14:30, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
For a start, you are using an obsolete list e-mail which has been changed long ago. For those who do filtering of incoming mails it may end up in the wrong bucket.
Use: List-Id: Support and discussion of the openSUSE distributions <support.lists.opensuse.org> ;-)
That's not the email address. (Why the winky, Carlos?) Also from the header of these messages: List-Post: <mailto:support@lists.opensuse.org> -- Robert Webb
On 2024-02-12 23:05, Robert Webb wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 19:34:57 +0100, "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@telefonica.net> wrote:
On 2024-02-12 14:30, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
For a start, you are using an obsolete list e-mail which has been changed long ago. For those who do filtering of incoming mails it may end up in the wrong bucket.
Use: List-Id: Support and discussion of the openSUSE distributions <support.lists.opensuse.org> ;-)
That's not the email address. (Why the winky, Carlos?) Also from the header of these messages:
Certainly, it is not the email address. It is another header that doesn't change whether you use opensuse-support@opensuse.org or support@lists.opensuse.org. It is the recommended header for filtering purposes. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.5 x86_64 at Telcontar)
On dinsdag 13 februari 2024 13:09:54 CET Carlos E. R. wrote:
Certainly, it is not the email address. It is another header that doesn't change whether you use opensuse-support@opensuse.org or support@lists.opensuse.org. It is the recommended header for filtering purposes. Can you please stop replying off-topic? The couple of you guys spoil whatever interest I still have in digesting the MLs. They are becoming entirely useless.
-- Gertjan Lettink a.k.a. Knurpht openSUSE Board openSUSE Forums Team
On 2024-02-13 13:16, Knurpht-openSUSE wrote:
On dinsdag 13 februari 2024 13:09:54 CET Carlos E. R. wrote:
Certainly, it is not the email address. It is another header that doesn't change whether you use opensuse-support@opensuse.org or support@lists.opensuse.org. It is the recommended header for filtering purposes. Can you please stop replying off-topic? The couple of you guys spoil whatever interest I still have in digesting the MLs. They are becoming entirely useless.
My reply is on topic for this list. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.5 x86_64 at Telcontar)
My reply is on topic for this list. No, it's not. And you know. Currently you and a couple of others are dragging each topic off-topic both on users@ and support@ . Proof is all over the recent
On dinsdag 13 februari 2024 13:27:10 CET Carlos E. R. wrote: threads. This topic is " Repositories and priority " and most replies are not even related. Guess this list needs moderation turned back on. -- Gertjan Lettink a.k.a. Knurpht openSUSE Board openSUSE Forums Team
On 2024-02-13 13:34, Knurpht-openSUSE wrote:
On dinsdag 13 februari 2024 13:27:10 CET Carlos E. R. wrote:
My reply is on topic for this list. No, it's not. And you know.
Yes it is and you know it.
Currently you and a couple of others are dragging each topic off-topic both on users@ and support@ . Proof is all over the recent threads. This topic is " Repositories and priority " and most replies are not even related. Guess this list needs moderation turned back on.
Shows your bias. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.5 x86_64 at Telcontar)
On Tuesday 13 February 2024 01:34:06 PM (+01:00), Knurpht-openSUSE wrote:
My reply is on topic for this list. No, it's not. And you know. Currently you and a couple of others are dragging each topic off-topic both on users@ and support@ . Proof is all over the recent
On dinsdag 13 februari 2024 13:27:10 CET Carlos E. R. wrote: threads. This topic is " Repositories and priority " and most replies are not even related. Guess this list needs moderation turned back on.
knurpht is right in my opinion, and if somebody wanted to take the trouble to moderate these lists i wouldn't mind. on the other hand, a few off-topic mails don't really bother me, particularly with a topic that's relevant to listmail in general. takes a second to mark as 'read' and go on. -- phani.
On 2024-02-13 14:24, phanisvara das wrote:
On Tuesday 13 February 2024 01:34:06 PM (+01:00), Knurpht-openSUSE wrote:
My reply is on topic for this list. No, it's not. And you know. Currently you and a couple of others are dragging > each topic off-topic both on users@ and support@ . Proof is all over the recent > threads. This topic is " Repositories and
On dinsdag 13 februari 2024 13:27:10 CET Carlos E. R. wrote: priority " and most replies are not > even related. Guess this list needs moderation turned back on. > knurpht is right in my opinion, and if somebody wanted to take the trouble to moderate these lists i wouldn't mind. on the other hand, a few off-topic mails don't really bother me, particularly with a topic that's relevant to listmail in general. takes a second to mark as 'read' and go on.
My reply was on advice on how to filter and sort the mail list. This is perfectly on topic, IMO. It is on how to use software and tools provided by openSUSE. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.5 x86_64 at Telcontar)
Le 13/02/2024 à 14:34, Carlos E.R. a écrit :
My reply was on advice on how to filter and sort the mail list. This is perfectly on topic, IMO. It is on how to use software and tools provided by openSUSE.
look at the subject... that said, it takes 1/10s to clic "delete" jdd -- https://artdagio.fr
Il 13/02/24 10:34, Carlos E.R. ha scritto:
On 2024-02-13 14:24, phanisvara das wrote:
On Tuesday 13 February 2024 01:34:06 PM (+01:00), Knurpht-openSUSE wrote:
My reply is on topic for this list. No, it's not. And you know. Currently you and a couple of others are dragging > each topic off-topic both on users@ and support@ . Proof is all over the recent > threads. This topic is " Repositories and priority " and most replies are not > even related. Guess this
On dinsdag 13 februari 2024 13:27:10 CET Carlos E. R. wrote: list needs moderation turned back on. > knurpht is right in my opinion, and if somebody wanted to take the trouble to moderate these lists i wouldn't mind. on the other hand, a few off-topic mails don't really bother me, particularly with a topic that's relevant to listmail in general. takes a second to mark as 'read' and go on.
My reply was on advice on how to filter and sort the mail list. This is perfectly on topic, IMO. It is on how to use software and tools provided by openSUSE.
I was the OP for this Subject and I would like to say what (IMHO) is happening nowadays: An user ask for something on the list, someone reply, but most frequently he focus not on the submitted topic, whereas he opens other sub/off topic, often setting himself up as the "System-Guru" maybe acting as to be "the mailing list super-star" showing their incredible skill and knowledge, perhaps in the attempt to impress the OP and other users that could be reading the same message. Well, I never get impressed by these kind of people, instead I just get bored by their attitude 🙂 I think that if you are able, or wish to help, then you should answer to the OP, if not is better if you shut up, you will gain much more points! Take Care & Keep Calm! Regards, -- Marco Calistri Build: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20240211 Kernel: 6.7.2-1-default - XFCE: (4.18.3) Uptime: 10:00:01 up 6 days 19:50, 1 user, carico medio: 1,48, 1,36, 0,94
Which has absolutely nothing to do with the subject line. Please stop being so argumentative as you often are. Ken Schneider
On Feb 13, 2024, at 8:34 AM, Carlos E.R. <robin.listas@gmx.es> wrote:
On 2024-02-13 14:24, phanisvara das wrote:
On Tuesday 13 February 2024 01:34:06 PM (+01:00), Knurpht-openSUSE wrote:
On dinsdag 13 februari 2024 13:27:10 CET Carlos E. R. wrote:
My reply is on topic for this list. No, it's not. And you know. Currently you and a couple of others are dragging > each topic off-topic both on users@ and support@ . Proof is all over the recent > threads. This topic is " Repositories and priority " and most replies are not > even related. Guess this list needs moderation turned back on. > knurpht is right in my opinion, and if somebody wanted to take the trouble to moderate these lists i wouldn't mind. on the other hand, a few off-topic mails don't really bother me, particularly with a topic that's relevant to listmail in general. takes a second to mark as 'read' and go on.
My reply was on advice on how to filter and sort the mail list. This is perfectly on topic, IMO. It is on how to use software and tools provided by openSUSE.
-- Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R. (from 15.5 x86_64 at Telcontar)
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:34:14 +0100 "Carlos E.R." <robin.listas@gmx.es> wrote:
On 2024-02-13 14:24, phanisvara das wrote:
On dinsdag 13 februari 2024 13:27:10 CET Carlos E. R. wrote:
My reply is on topic for this list. No, it's not. And you know. Currently you and a couple of others are dragging > each topic off-topic both on users@ and support@ . Proof is all over the recent > threads. This topic is " Repositories and
On Tuesday 13 February 2024 01:34:06 PM (+01:00), Knurpht-openSUSE wrote: priority " and most replies are not > even related. Guess this list needs moderation turned back on. > knurpht is right in my opinion, and if somebody wanted to take the trouble to moderate these lists i wouldn't mind. on the other hand, a few off-topic mails don't really bother me, particularly with a topic that's relevant to listmail in general. takes a second to mark as 'read' and go on.
My reply was on advice on how to filter and sort the mail list. This is perfectly on topic, IMO. It is on how to use software and tools provided by openSUSE.
What you posted is (or may be) relevant for the list, but what is relevant for the topic is determined by the subject and content of the OP's post. So you were wrong to post in this thread and should have started another thread if you cared enough.
On 2024-02-12 14:04, Marco Calistri wrote:
Hello!
File /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstresindvd.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.22.9-3.1.x86_64 (Repository principale (OSS)) conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-orig-addon-1.22.6-33.2.x86_64 (@System)
File /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstsiren.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.22.9-3.1.x86_64 (Repository principale (OSS)) conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-orig-addon-1.22.6-33.2.x86_64 (@System)
How should I avoid to receive this kind of warnings during the update process?
You can not. You have to report each of those problems, not caused by you (normally).
sudo zypper lr -E -P
...
I wish to keep Packman at higher priority,
Just give it a lower number. Your priorities are strange, normally the official repos have a priority of about 99.
now I don't know what OSS Vs. @System means in the warning.
@System means currently installed. If you are using TW, it may happen that the package is no longer in the repos.
Could you please be so kind to explain?
Thanks!
-- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from openSUSE 15.5 (Laicolasse))
Il 12/02/24 15:40, Carlos E. R. ha scritto:
On 2024-02-12 14:04, Marco Calistri wrote:
Hello!
File /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstresindvd.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.22.9-3.1.x86_64 (Repository principale (OSS)) conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-orig-addon-1.22.6-33.2.x86_64 (@System)
File /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstsiren.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-1.22.9-3.1.x86_64 (Repository principale (OSS)) conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-orig-addon-1.22.6-33.2.x86_64 (@System)
How should I avoid to receive this kind of warnings during the update process?
You can not.
You have to report each of those problems, not caused by you (normally).
sudo zypper lr -E -P
...
I wish to keep Packman at higher priority,
Just give it a lower number. Your priorities are strange, normally the official repos have a priority of about 99.
now I don't know what OSS Vs. @System means in the warning.
@System means currently installed. If you are using TW, it may happen that the package is no longer in the repos.
Could you please be so kind to explain?
Thanks!
Yes Carlos, Patrick has already and briefely answered to what I was looking for. Thanks! -- Marco Calistri Build: openSUSE Tumbleweed 20240209 Kernel: 6.7.2-1-default - XFCE: (4.18.3) Uptime: 16:00:00 up 6 days 1:50, 1 user, carico medio: 0,30, 0,36, 0,36
participants (10)
-
Andrei Borzenkov -
Carlos E. R. -
Carlos E.R. -
Dave Howorth -
jdd＠dodin.org -
Knurpht-openSUSE -
kschneider bout-tyme.net -
Marco Calistri -
phanisvara das -
Robert Webb