Hi All, Because openSUSE.Asia Summit already run 3 years, and there are lots of kindly people give help and support it. But we think there should be a rule for openSUSE.Asia Summit committee members, and also want those committee members could bear more responsibility and share more loading from local host team. The "openSUSE.Asia Summit committee and vote ticket Rules" list below: --- Until now the actively openSUSE community are Asia is this 4 community : [China][Indonesia][Japan][Taiwan]. 1. Every community get up to 3 vote ticket for voting next openSUSE.Asia Summit Host. 2. How to get vote ticket ? 2.1 Not in these 4 commnuity but had host openSUSE.Asia Summit => 3 vote ticket. 2.2 One community host openSUSE.Asia Summit twice and active openSUSE Community in Asia => Separate to two vote group , and the new group get up to 3 vote ticket. [Example : New (Asia Summit-{year}) group get up to 3 ticket and The community still keep up to 3 vote ticket] 2.3 One community host third times (or more) will also follow rule (2.2), the Community and previous Asia Summit group(s) keep up to 3 ticket, new (Asia Summit-{year}) group get up to 3 ticket. 2.4 Start at 2018/1/1 , who don't host any openSUSE.Asia Summit yet -> 0 vote ticket. 3. The member of openSUSE.Asia Summit Committee is who owns vote ticket. 4. openSUSE.Asia Summit Committee should give openSUSE.Asia Summit event support. 5. These rules will be fixed / increased / descreased by openSUSE Board. The voting proposal are asked and agreed by 2014,2015 and 2016 openSUSE.Asia Summit general coordinator and committee. Please feel free to let us know if you have any suggestion. If nobody has objection, we will start to take vote. Sunny, Edwin, Ftake and Sakana, would you please provide the list of committees (up to 3) with their name and email to me for creating voting list. Cheers, AL On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 13:41 +0800, Yan Sun wrote:
Hi Hillwood, Ftake,
Thank you for your feedback. Since both of you prefer option 1, let's kick-off voting.
AL will share proposal of voting rule in this mail loop in these days. If nobody has objection, we will start to take vote. Thank you for your patience.
Best, Sunny
On 06/01/2017 09:11 PM, Hillwood Yang wrote:
Hi Sunny,
I prefer the first one. Our local team need enough time to prepare summit. The calling for paper for Gnome.Asia Summit 2017 is beginning, so we wanna get the final as quickly as possible, so that it could not impact the planning about considering to hold this two events together.
Thanks!
在 2017-06-01四的 11:20 +0800，Yan Sun写道：
Dear Ftake, Hillwood,
Firstly, thank you for your proposal of openSUSE.Asia Summit 2017.
We planed to announced final candidate on end of May, but we couldn't make it, sorry for the delay. openSUSE board is confirming Asia Summit budget with SUSE who is the biggest sponsors.
We have two options at the moment. 1. "Asia Committee" kick off voting for the two proposals when openSUSE board is confirming sponsorship in parallel.
2. After openSUSE board gets confirmation of sponsorship, we kick off voting.
Both two options have potential risk and advantage, so I'm composing this mail to have an open discussion with you, what do you think?
Best, Sunny
On 05/29/2017 09:43 PM, Fuminobu TAKEYAMA wrote:
Hi Sunny and all,
Any update about the review? I am wondering if the result will be available on schedule (by the end of May).
Thanks,
-- Fuminobu TAKEYAMA (ftake)
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-summit+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-summit+owner@opensuse.org