Did anyone run into this? He is referring to the 7.1 RPMs.
I updated my 7.1 system last night and didn't have this problem.
-g
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:58:53 -0400
From: Keith Monroe
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:57:03PM -0400, Gregory Goddard wrote:
Did anyone run into this? He is referring to the 7.1 RPMs.
I updated my 7.1 system last night and didn't have this problem.
I checked, and indeed the 6.4 and 7.0 RPMs do not have an s bit on suexec. But apparently they never had. All others do have the s bit. Olaf -- Olaf Kirch | Anyone who has had to work with X.509 has probably okir@suse.de | experienced what can best be described as ---------------+ ISO water torture. -- Peter Gutmann
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:26:01AM +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:57:03PM -0400, Gregory Goddard wrote:
Did anyone run into this? He is referring to the 7.1 RPMs.
I updated my 7.1 system last night and didn't have this problem.
I checked, and indeed the 6.4 and 7.0 RPMs do not have an s bit on suexec. But apparently they never had.
That's true -- but SuSEconfig sets the permissions of the suexec binary according to /etc/permissions.* and the setting of CHECK_PERMISSIONS and PERMISSION_SECURITY in /etc/rc.config. Thus, SuSEconfig needs to be run. Alternatively chkstat [-set] /etc/permissions.secure can be used. Peter -- VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day...
participants (3)
-
Gregory Goddard
-
Olaf Kirch
-
Peter Poeml