RE: [suse-security] Hide/Change MTA Mailheader
is it possible to change the Mailer information in der EMailheader from Sendmail 8.xx to a other Name?
Have you even *tried* Google? Check http://www.google.com/search?q=change+sendmail+banner&sourceid=opera&num=0&i e=utf-8&oe=utf-8, when I queried that just now, the fourth hit gives you exactly what you want.. Sheesh.. Tobias
* Reckhard, Tobias (tobias.reckhard@secunet.com) [021008 00:14]: ::> is it possible to change the Mailer information in der ::> EMailheader from ::> Sendmail 8.xx to a other Name? :: ::Have you even *tried* Google? :: ::Check ::http://www.google.com/search?q=change+sendmail+banner&sourceid=opera&num=0&i ::e=utf-8&oe=utf-8, when I queried that just now, the fourth hit gives you ::exactly what you want.. :: ::Sheesh.. ::Tobias Wow! Your a rude bastard. -- Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@whack.org Tell me what you believe.. I tell you what you should see.
Wow! Your a rude bastard. No, simply accurate and direct. Although one could consider calling someone a "bastard" as rude.
We have no problem answering simple questions and do not think there is such a thing as a stupid question; only lazy people. The question just could have been "I tried this and only got that", or "where actually is this generated". If someone wants to have his system done for him, he can just hire someone. Lets hope the nature of lists like these remain a bit more elevated and stimulating than that. Peter
Hi, Leaving aside the spat for a minute - I must say I have found Google, etc, very useful and always look there first before coming here. Having said that I also realise that sometimes it doesn't produce the desired result simply due to the fact that people differ in their search text entry choices. Personally I wouldn't necessarily assume people hadn't looked there first. Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 10/8/02, 9:19:21 AM, Peter van den Heuvel
Wow! Your a rude bastard. No, simply accurate and direct. Although one could consider calling someone a "bastard" as rude.
We have no problem answering simple questions and do not think there is such a thing as a stupid question; only lazy people. The question just could have been "I tried this and only got that", or "where actually is this generated". If someone wants to have his system done for him, he can just hire someone. Lets hope the nature of lists like these remain a bit more elevated and stimulating than that.
Peter
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com Security-related bug reports go to security@suse.de, not here
* Peter van den Heuvel (peter@bank-connect.com) [021008 01:21]: ::>Wow! Your a rude bastard. ::No, simply accurate and direct. Although one could consider calling ::someone a "bastard" as rude. :: ::We have no problem answering simple questions and do not ::think there is such a thing as a stupid question; only lazy people. ::The question just could have been "I tried this and only got that", or ::"where actually is this generated". If someone wants to have his system ::done for him, he can just hire someone. Lets hope the nature of lists ::like these remain a bit more elevated and stimulating than that. Well, sorry about that response but the attitude that was displayed was that of "OH MY God! You are so stupid that you couldn't figure out Google!" "Why don't you RTFM before bringing your petty, very easy questions to this list." My question would be how does one tell the difference between lazy and just a bit freaked out about the overwhelming nature of being a newbie. I guess my horrors in joining the club and learning these things made me give everyone the benefit of the doubt and not have a "Oh My how simple..just do this." attitude. Sorry that my tired, cranky attitude at 1am got the better of me. It's just that when I started with Linux and Unix a number of years ago and I found it a bit overwhelming. Sometimes the simple route eluded me and I needed the help of people who knew more. The reply email was condescending and quite rude to the guy's question. I should have just hit the d key. I didn't and I'm sorry. I apologize. -- Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@whack.org Tell me what you believe.. I tell you what you should see.
At Dienstag, 8. Oktober 2002 09:31 Ben Rosenberg wrote:
[when tobias.reckhard@secunet.com answered him] ::Have you even *tried* Google? ::Check ::http://www.google.com/search? ... Wow! Your a rude bastard.
Words, words, words. The link you got, Mr. Rosenberg, was totally valid. And the "hit" on your ego also. But let's act instead of just talk... So ben@whack.org just entered my filter list... Which means I am not going to answer your questions at any time. Feel free to do the same with my email address - whatever I have to say is not meant for you anyway - from now on. good bye, Ben, may you enjoy eternal life! -- Michael Zimmermann (http://vegaa.de)
participants (5)
-
Andrew Bennett -
Ben Rosenberg -
Michael Zimmermann -
Peter van den Heuvel -
Reckhard, Tobias