Re: [suse-security] liby2util update on SuSE 9.1 breaks online_update?
Has anybody else seen this?
Yes, this guy here[1] rpm -q --whatprovides liby2pm.so.2 says yast2-packagemanager-2.9.52-0.2 so try to rollback the package with one version from ./lib/YaST2/you/mnt/i386/update/9.1/rpm/xxx [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-390@vm.marist.edu/msg31085.html Hope that helps a bit the polarizer http://www.codixx.de/polarizer.html
Hello. On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:33:03PM +0200, Polarizer wrote:
Has anybody else seen this?
We disabled the patch and will provide a fix soon.
It only affects 9.1.
--
Bye,
Thomas
--
Thomas Biege
We disabled the patch It seems that this didn't work very well. The patches are still present on the mirror servers. A fellow user reported that the mirrors in Darmstadt and Kaiserslautern still offer the patches 6 hours after your
Thomas Biege wrote: post. Maybe all the users trying to download the new 10.0 are overloading your ftp server so even the mirrors cannot update? Or are they just updating in 24 hour intervals or something like that? Regards nordi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Morning, nordi wrote:
We disabled the patch It seems that this didn't work very well. The patches are still present on the mirror servers. A fellow user reported that the mirrors in Darmstadt and Kaiserslautern still offer the patches 6 hours after your
Thomas Biege wrote: post.
Did you check if the rpm is still there or the patch-description? YOU only checks for descriptions, if they exist, it offers the content as patch. IIRC fou4s doesn't check for descriptions in the first way, so you might just having trouble when using fou4s.
Maybe all the users trying to download the new 10.0 are overloading your ftp server so even the mirrors cannot update? Or are they just updating in 24 hour intervals or something like that?
Mirrorupdate is done in intervals, dunno how often exactly, but afair at least once a day. Regards, Sven -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDR3gJQoCguWUBzBwRAqstAKCUBet/2piz1gEK+7zYMnEK1n2whgCcCNJk A/YbA78HmvISlU2D8CquUoU= =dYG7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
/ 2005-10-08 09:40:57 +0200 \ Sven 'Darkman' Michels:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Morning,
nordi wrote:
We disabled the patch It seems that this didn't work very well. The patches are still present on the mirror servers. A fellow user reported that the mirrors in Darmstadt and Kaiserslautern still offer the patches 6 hours after your
Thomas Biege wrote: post.
Did you check if the rpm is still there or the patch-description? YOU only checks for descriptions, if they exist, it offers the content as patch. IIRC fou4s doesn't check for descriptions in the first way,
that is not correct. fou4s can do without descriptions, but by default uses them, and much effort has gone into it to make it correctly parse them. however, it normally does not _delete_ descriptions locally once they have been downloaded. If one uses some rsync server url, one could specify --delete in the rsyncopts in updatePackageList, though. Probably the fou4s cache has to be rebuilt, then, too.
so you might just having trouble when using fou4s.
the trouble is not with fou4s, nor with yast, but with broken packages. anyways, no real harm done (this time). cheers, -- : Lars Ellenberg Tel +43-1-8178292-0 : : LINBIT Information Technologies GmbH Fax +43-1-8178292-82 : : Schoenbrunner Str. 244, A-1120 Vienna/Europe http://www.linbit.com :
On Friday 07 October 2005 03:49 am, Thomas Biege wrote:
We disabled the patch and will provide a fix soon. It only affects 9.1.
Has it been "soon" yet? Is it safe to install the liby2util that the US mirrors are offering (seems to carry the same version number as the bad version)? -- Patrick Gross Maple Valley, WA
participants (6)
-
Lars Ellenberg -
nordi -
Patrick Gross -
Polarizer -
Sven 'Darkman' Michels -
Thomas Biege