Re: [suse-security] Did SuSE hack ls or which?
[about OpenSSH] This is becoming a boomerang, and I start losing patience over it.
As far as my fault is concerned, you Roman - as a moderator of the suse-security list - allready had received my apologies in private email conversation, before you decided to post my erronuous and misleading statements to the list anyway.
Just dropping the boomerang would have been enough - no need to throw it back. .o)
You are right, it was a loooong night, please forgive me. The thing with the boomerang is something else: It seems we can't stop telling people that crypto updates for 7.0 and older are at ftp.suse.de, not ftp.suse.com, even though we mention this fact whereever necessary in the announcements. Hmmm.
Greetings Michael
Roman. -- - - | Roman Drahtmüller <draht@suse.de> // "You don't need eyes to see, | SuSE GmbH - Security Phone: // you need vision!" | Nürnberg, Germany +49-911-740530 // Maxi Jazz, Faithless | - -
Hi all,
I have a problem with our qmail-server. It´s a open relay.
How do you know?
I have run some bugfixes but it doesn´t fix this.
qmail will not relay when correctly configured. Check the FAQ and the wonderful document 'Life with Qmail' - especially the items about the environmentvariables and about the file rcpthosts.
Have anybody a idea?
I've often read that some spam-testing sites will say qmail relays, but that this is false; qmail accepts some mails and mails them to a local user but won't relay them. For the sites, acceptance = relaying. Falsely. Good luck, Jurriaan
participants (2)
-
Jurriaan Kalkman
-
Roman Drahtmueller