![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/6a3e4d568d9e00545e58890ba1f25fa2.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Some rpm- and srpm-packages haven't a signature. For Example: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/update/6.4/n1/bind8.rpm ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/update/6.4/zq1/modules-2.3.9-63.src.rpm ...(bind8, aaa_base, modules, bindutil, perl, syslogd). Why?
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/edc47c145813667538fa627e7c053477.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Some rpm- and srpm-packages haven't a signature. For Example:
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/update/6.4/n1/bind8.rpm ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/update/6.4/zq1/modules-2.3.9-63.src.rpm ...(bind8, aaa_base, modules, bindutil, perl, syslogd). Why?
Because the packages haven't been signed at that time. Package signatures
were introduced with SuSE-7.1. Yes, this was late...
Thanks,
Roman.
--
- -
| Roman Drahtmüller
participants (2)
-
Mitchel-Martin Timm
-
Roman Drahtmueller