:/etc # inetd -d Segmentation fault Has anyone seen this before?? this is a SuSE 7.0 box. Nothing special about it. I currently have xinetd installed also, but its switched off... I was going to use xinetd instead, but it doesn't seem to hand the originating IP address of connections through to the processes it spawns!!??!! :-( At least not with Obtuse smtpd.. I have deleted inted.conf and rpm-e inetd then rpm -i inted.rpm with the rpm file from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/current/suse/n1/ Can anyone off some suggestions?? --- Nix - nix@susesecurity.com http://www.susesecurity.com
* Nix (suse@nix.hispeed.com) [010228 19:47]:
:/etc # inetd -d Segmentation fault
Has anyone seen this before?? this is a SuSE 7.0 box. Nothing special about it.
Hmmm...maybe strace inetd -d 2>&1 | tee /tmp/foo and put foo somewhere publicly accessible (it will probably be several hundred lines). -- -ckm
Nix wrote:
:/etc # inetd -d Segmentation fault
Has anyone seen this before?? this is a SuSE 7.0 box. Nothing special about it.
Hi Nix, sorry - but I can't reproduce it here - either on a SuSE-7.0 nor on a SuSE-7.1 box. What about tcpdchk on your box?!? Did you read my thread last week and are you able to reproduce my failure?!? Christoph -- .-. Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum /v\ L I N U X Lehrstuhl fuer Biophysik // \\ >Penguin Computing< c/o Christoph Wegener /( )\ Gebaeude ND 04/Nord ^^-^^ D-44780 Bochum, GERMANY Tel: +49 (234) 32-25754 Fax: +49 (234) 32-14626 mailto://cwe@bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de http://www.bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Hi, I had a similar problem with xinetd (not with inetd) as delivered with SuSE 7.1, and with all 2.4.X-SuSE kernels: xinetd never started, it aborted complainig about net-pf-10 (which stands for IPv6 in the SuSE configuration). I recompiled xinetd without the inet6 support, and it works well since then. I think all this IPv6/IPv4 transition and tunneling things are not well synchronized among the different network packages, and I don't care so much about, because I have no use for it at the moment. Of course, maybe I've overseen some trivial thing about the xinetd/ipv6/modules-configuration; I would be glad to know about it. Hope this helps a little, Manuel Elgorriaga Kunze
-----Original Message----- From: Christoph Wegener [mailto:cwe@bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 8:55 AM To: Nix Cc: suse-security@suse.com Subject: Re: [suse-security] inetd Segmentation fault
Nix wrote:
:/etc # inetd -d Segmentation fault
Has anyone seen this before?? this is a SuSE 7.0 box. Nothing special about it.
Hi Nix, sorry - but I can't reproduce it here - either on a SuSE-7.0 nor on a SuSE-7.1 box.
What about tcpdchk on your box?!? Did you read my thread last week and are you able to reproduce my failure?!?
Christoph -- .-. Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum /v\ L I N U X Lehrstuhl fuer Biophysik // \\ >Penguin Computing< c/o Christoph Wegener /( )\ Gebaeude ND 04/Nord ^^-^^ D-44780 Bochum, GERMANY
Tel: +49 (234) 32-25754 Fax: +49 (234) 32-14626 mailto://cwe@bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de http://www.bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com
I got a seg fault from inetd when I had a service in it, which wasn't installed. HTH Anders On Thursday 01 March 2001 04:46, Nix wrote:
:/etc # inetd -d
Segmentation fault
Has anyone seen this before?? this is a SuSE 7.0 box. Nothing special about it.
I currently have xinetd installed also, but its switched off... I was going to use xinetd instead, but it doesn't seem to hand the originating IP address of connections through to the processes it spawns!!??!! :-( At least not with Obtuse smtpd..
I have deleted inted.conf and rpm-e inetd then rpm -i inted.rpm with the rpm file from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/current/suse/n1/
Can anyone off some suggestions??
--- Nix - nix@susesecurity.com http://www.susesecurity.com
Anders Johansson wrote:
I got a seg fault from inetd when I had a service in it, which wasn't installed.
Only for information: Sorry - but I just doublechecked this - I can't reproduce that (neither on 7.0 nor on 7.1)... Christoph BTW: Does anyone have problems with 'more' on a 7.1 box?!? -- .-. Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum /v\ L I N U X Lehrstuhl fuer Biophysik // \\ >Penguin Computing< c/o Christoph Wegener /( )\ Gebaeude ND 04/Nord ^^-^^ D-44780 Bochum, GERMANY Tel: +49 (234) 32-25754 Fax: +49 (234) 32-14626 mailto://cwe@bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de http://www.bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
I obviously can't say that it was the reason - it may just as well be a problem with parsing inetd.conf - but I had the wuftp line uncommented without having wuftp installed, and inetd segfaulted until I commented it out. Anders PS. I still haven't received 7.1, so I can't check it. Is there anyone in europe ouside Germany who has received their 7.1 subscription? On Thursday 01 March 2001 11:30, Christoph Wegener wrote:
Anders Johansson wrote:
I got a seg fault from inetd when I had a service in it, which wasn't installed.
Only for information: Sorry - but I just doublechecked this - I can't reproduce that (neither on 7.0 nor on 7.1)... Christoph
BTW: Does anyone have problems with 'more' on a 7.1 box?!? -- .-. Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum /v\ L I N U X Lehrstuhl fuer Biophysik // \\ >Penguin Computing< c/o Christoph Wegener /( )\ Gebaeude ND 04/Nord ^^-^^ D-44780 Bochum, GERMANY
Tel: +49 (234) 32-25754 Fax: +49 (234) 32-14626 mailto://cwe@bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de http://www.bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com
participants (5)
-
Anders Johansson -
Christoph Wegener -
Christopher Mahmood -
Manuel Elgorriaga Kunze -
Nix