routing question / a little bit off topic (I'm sorry)
Hello all imagine following situation: nt box-------------------------router ----------------------nt4box eth1:10.0.0.100 eth0:1 10.0.0.1 eth0:2 192.168.1.1 eth0 192.168.1.2 gw 10.0.0.1 gw 192.168.1.1 As you can see the router (nt4 box) has got two IPs on one eth. Is routing possible here, or doesn't it work because of the fact that there is just one eth? thank you Philipp
Hello all
imagine following situation:
nt box-------------------------router ----------------------nt4box eth1:10.0.0.100 eth0:1 10.0.0.1 eth0:2 192.168.1.1 eth0 192.168.1.2 gw 10.0.0.1 gw 192.168.1.1
As you can see the router (nt4 box) has got two IPs on one eth. Is routing possible here, or doesn't it work because of the fact that there is just one eth?
thank you Philipp
eth0 on the router will tell eth1 of the left NT box via ICMP packets to
not send the packets to the router but to the left NT box directly,
provided that NT does respect these messages. This behaviour can be turned
off in the proc filesystem of the router: See
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/send_redirects and the relevant documentation in
the kernel source tree (Documentation/proc.txt).
Thanks,
Roman.
--
- -
| Roman Drahtmüller
hi, i was using a similar setup for ip masquerading some time ago. it should work. still ipforwarding has to be enabled on the "router". bye, -alexm On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Philipp Snizek wrote:
imagine following situation:
nt box-------------------------router ----------------------nt4box eth1:10.0.0.100 eth0:1 10.0.0.1 eth0:2 192.168.1.1 eth0 192.168.1.2 gw 10.0.0.1 gw 192.168.1.1
As you can see the router (nt4 box) has got two IPs on one eth. Is routing possible here, or doesn't it work because of the fact that there is just one eth?
participants (3)
-
alex medvedev -
Philipp Snizek -
Roman Drahtmueller