Q: SuSE FTP Server broken or hacked?
Hello, last Friday I installed a fresh SuSE 8.1 from FTP... Now on monday morning I tried to update but always get. Error: Signature check for patch info files failed. Can't load patch information. Looks like either the patch files are broken or were tried to be backdoored. Stefan Esser
Please check if you have the proper key there has been an update of the signature key
>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
last Friday I installed a fresh SuSE 8.1 from FTP... Now on monday morning I tried to update but always get.
Error: Signature check for patch info files failed. Can't load patch information.
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:15:27AM +0000, Frank W.Kooistra wrote:
Please check if you have the proper key
there has been an update of the signature key
I have the proper key installed in my keyring which expires 2006-02-12. I also set the clock correct... I still get invalid signature on the patch files. Stefan Esser
On Dec 2, Stefan Esser <s.esser@e-matters.de> wrote:
I have the proper key installed in my keyring which expires 2006-02-12. You have installed it in YOUR keyring, but not in the RPM keyring! Read my last message.
Markus -- __________________ /"\ Markus Gaugusch \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign markus@gaugusch.at X Against HTML Mail / \
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:49:52AM +0100, Markus Gaugusch wrote:
On Dec 2, Stefan Esser <s.esser@e-matters.de> wrote:
I have the proper key installed in my keyring which expires 2006-02-12. You have installed it in YOUR keyring, but not in the RPM keyring! Read my last message.
Markus
Well after installing the keys in the NOT existing RPM keyring it worked fine. I just wonder why Yast cries when installing patches but not when installing the packages ?!. This sounds fishy to me. Stefan
And the information on the site : http://www.suse.de/en/private/support/security/index.html is outdated
>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
I have the proper key installed in my keyring which expires 2006-02-12.
I also set the clock correct...
I still get invalid signature on the patch files.
--- Stefan Esser <s.esser@e-matters.de> wrote:
Error: Signature check for patch info files failed. Can't load patch information. Hi Stefan, I have the same problem in 80. If you have the patience, just click install for every package the program asks. Which packeges get installed, will be nevertheless correctly preselected if you do manual update. If you search with keyword 'YOU' at sdb.suse.com, there are several hints listed, particulary http://sdb.suse.de/de/sdb/html/swiegra_you-gpg.html, but neiter this nor other helped me so far. Don't know whats going on.
Peter. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
On Dec 2, Using SuSE <usingsuse80@yahoo.com> wrote:
If you search with keyword 'YOU' at sdb.suse.com, there are several hints listed, particulary http://sdb.suse.de/de/sdb/html/swiegra_you-gpg.html, but neiter this nor other helped me so far. Don't know whats going on. You must import the new suse build key into RPM's keyring export GNUPGHOME=/usr/lib/rpm/gnupg and then delete the old key and add the new one ...
markus -- __________________ /"\ Markus Gaugusch \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign markus@gaugusch.at X Against HTML Mail / \
* Using SuSE wrote on Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:25 -0800:
--- Stefan Esser <s.esser@e-matters.de> wrote:
Error: Signature check for patch info files failed. Can't load patch information. If you have the patience, just click install for every package the program asks. Which packeges get installed, will be nevertheless correctly preselected if you do manual update.
So in this case you still can install packages with wrong signatures? Did you get a big fat warning requiring to enter 3 letter "yes" to procceed? Otherwise this just must be a bug! oki, Steffen -- Dieses Schreiben wurde maschinell erstellt, es trägt daher weder Unterschrift noch Siegel.
participants (5)
-
Frank W.Kooistra -
Markus Gaugusch -
Stefan Esser -
Steffen Dettmer -
Using SuSE