hallo procmail experts!!! can somebody post a procmail rule to filter that socks5 message out? thanks, -alexm
hallo procmail experts!!!
can somebody post a procmail rule to filter that socks5 message out?
thanks,
-alexm
I've nuked this person from the list. Unfortunately, there's not much else
that I can do right now.
This is the procmail rule:
:0 HB
* ^From.*eter.ten.have@home.nl.*
* ^To:.*suse-security@suse.com
/dev/null
This is a mess...
Roman.
--
- -
| Roman Drahtmüller
This is a mess...
Roman.
But not as bad as NtBugtraq or Bugtraq for out of office replies thank god. What is the email address to reach a list admin for future reference in case this happens? I've taken a "no-prisoners" policy on Linux-Security, any automated reply gets you bounced off the list (silently if it's really annoying =). BTW will SuSE "officially" be at hal2001? we should plan some linux security stuff. -Kurt
But not as bad as NtBugtraq or Bugtraq for out of office replies thank god. What is the email address to reach a list admin for future reference in case this happens? I've taken a "no-prisoners" policy on Linux-Security, any automated reply gets you bounced off the list (silently if it's really annoying =).
Right, I sometimes get as much as 30 automated replies from people. I want to thank Rainer Link who called me when I was on the road somewhere. German Autobahn has some advantages sometimes... :-) I'll work out something like an email address for the future if something like this happens again. Maybe our administrators in the Oakland office know some advice - they usually do.
BTW will SuSE "officially" be at hal2001? we should plan some linux security stuff.
Can't say yet. There is much work to do in the distribution...
-Kurt
Roman.
--
- -
| Roman Drahtmüller
participants (3)
-
alex medvedev -
Kurt Seifried -
Roman Drahtmueller