Hi, Suse kernel's do not have the ip_masq_h323 module, although someother distribution do have it. Is there any security reasons that the others have not noticed yet or is it just a preference by SuSE. If I compile it byself will I create headaches for myself if the answer to the first part is by preference. TIA -- Togan Muftuoglu
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
Hi,
Hi.
Suse kernel's do not have the ip_masq_h323 module, although someother distribution do have it. Is there any security reasons that the others have not noticed yet or is it just a preference by SuSE.
I'll make a source audit for ip_masq_h323 and ip_masq_netmeeting next month. If they seem to be secure, they may find their way to our CDs. :) Bye, Thomas -- Thomas Biege, SuSE GmbH, Schanzaeckerstr. 10, 90443 Nuernberg E@mail: thomas@suse.de Function: Security Support & Auditing "lynx -source http://www.suse.de/~thomas/thomas.pgp | pgp -fka" Key fingerprint = 51 AD B9 C7 34 FC F2 54 01 4A 1C D4 66 64 09 84
* Thomas Biege <thomas@suse.de> [010514 11:26]: Hi.
I'll make a source audit for ip_masq_h323 and ip_masq_netmeeting next month. If they seem to be secure, they may find their way to our CDs. :)
Now if this is not service what do call it then :))) -- Togan Muftuoglu
* Thomas Biege <thomas@suse.de> [010514 11:26]:
I'll make a source audit for ip_masq_h323 and ip_masq_netmeeting next month. If they seem to be secure, they may find their way to our CDs. :)
I have found a h323 proxy program http://www.opengatekeeper.org. Has anyone used this behind a firewall if so any special things to consider with an ipchains firewall -- Togan Muftuoglu
participants (2)
-
Thomas Biege -
Togan Muftuoglu