Are there any plans to "port" Bastille to SuSE? In Bastille's mailing list I found a thread about Niki Rahimi (from IBM) working with Olaf Kirch on "porting" Bastille to SuSE! What happened with this effort? SuSE doesn't have harden_suse anymore, Bastille isn't supported, we (I!) do need such a system's security hardening tool! Olaf? Richard -- Richard Ems ... e-mail: r.ems@gmx.net ... Computer Science, University of Hamburg "Do or do not. There is no try" - Yoda Yoda never programmed in Java.
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 18:33:43 +0200 Richard Ems <r.ems.mtg@gmx.net> wrote:
SuSE doesn't have harden_suse anymore, Bastille isn't supported, we (I!) do need such a system's security hardening tool!
Huh, SuSE have been using Bastille since 8.1. Charles -- ..you could spend *all day* customizing the title bar. Believe me. I speak from experience." (By Matt Welsh)
Charles Philip Chan wrote:
Huh, SuSE have been using Bastille since 8.1.
Yes, in 8.1 we have bastille-1.3.0-41.i586.rpm. But I've found nothing similar in 8.2, did you? Richard -- Richard Ems ... e-mail: r.ems@gmx.net ... Computer Science, University of Hamburg "Do or do not. There is no try" - Yoda Yoda never programmed in Java.
--=.W8l:rQFZ:qUD9= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:45:02 +0200 Richard Ems <r.ems.mtg@gmx.net> wrote:
Yes, in 8.1 we have bastille-1.3.0-41.i586.rpm. But I've found nothing similar in 8.2, did you?
Don't know, since I am still on 8.1. Update: You are right, just check a SuSE mirror, it is indeed not in 8.2! Charles -- "...and scantily clad females, of course. Who cares if it's below zero outside" (By Linus Torvalds) --=.W8l:rQFZ:qUD9= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQE/TkIf3epPyyKbwPYRAgNWAJQObT4qNm7WSrAUxey0hygwFojzAJkBz+Y+ Xj4z3VBsX4sCCVEHUaNgvw== =f2rD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.W8l:rQFZ:qUD9=--
participants (2)
-
Charles Philip Chan -
Richard Ems