Oyku Gencay wrote:
Sorry for the error :) I intended to write "crashes" not "crashed". Both BIND8 and 9 frequently (at least once in two days) crashes. BIND 4 was unsecure, but not so unstable.
----- Original Message ----- From: Schelstraete Bart <bschelst@bru-hub.dhl.com> To: Oyku Gencay <oykug@sbt.com.tr> Cc: SuSE Security <suse-security@suse.de> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 12:41 AM Subject: Re: [suse-security] DNS: BIND vs djbdns
Oyku Gencay wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering, does anyone of you are using djbdns (http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html) instead of BIND? What are your thoughts.
Apart
from being vulnerable, BIND frequently crashed.
BIND crashed? That's strange.........I never had any problems with running BIND. I think BIND is the most complete - stablest - nameserver.
(If you don't mind the security issues )
Bart
Never had BIND 8 crash on me...Actually for the first time ever I had Apache report "dead" in red to me. Started again easily though. Matt
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com