DNSSEC. views. basically anything new in bind 9 and alot of the stuff in bind 8. Plus DJB's license sucks ass, it's almost impossible for vendors to ship his software, and for developers to work on it, I haven't seen to many major improvements in qmail recently, stuff sendmail/postfix have, etc. Kurt Seifried, seifried@securityportal.com Securityportal - your focal point for security on the 'net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jurjen Oskam" <jurjen@quadpro.stupendous.org> To: <suse-security@suse.com> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 3:31 PM Subject: Re: [suse-security] CERT Advisory CA-2001-02 Multiple Vulnerabilities in BIND (fwd) On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:17:29 -0800, Jeremiah Johnson <jjohnson@penguincomputing.com> wrote:
And run a dns server incapable of doing any real features most people use in bind? I will admit, that dan bernstein does write really nice code. But the one reason its 'secure' is its complete lack of features.
Okay, I'll bite. (Just this once, though. :-) ) Please name the (some) features you use in BIND that aren't available in the djbdns suite. Also, please explain what you mean with "real" features. And a remark: just saying things like "complete lack of features" without ANY justification at all doesn't look very convincing. end -- Jurjen Oskam * carnivore! * http://www.stupendous.org/ for PGP key assassinate nuclear iraq clinton kill bomb USA eta ira cia fbi nsa kill president wall street ruin economy disrupt phonenetwork atomic bomb sarin nerve gas bin laden military -*- DVD Decryption at www.stupendous.org -*- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-security-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com