-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2005-06-23 at 14:20 +0200, Arjen de Korte wrote:
I noticed this because I manually edit bayes_99 to be 4.99 - but can I trust there is no other error in the scoring?
If you want to modify the scoring, you'd better do that in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf (or another .cf file placed in that directory). This will override the preconfigured defaults once and for all, without the need for intervention after each update.
I know, I did that right after my email. But I was simply testing my changes the day previous to the update, so I did not bother to edit local.cf yest - not knowing that the update was so near hand ;-)
I suggest that somebody with influence (ie, from SuSE) suggests the developers to add some automatic tests that impede this kind of congruences creeping in.
Why don't you do this yourself? You can submit bugs on 'http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org' yourself and find out that you as a user can have influence too. Better yet, submit the code for the suggested test yourself. If it is any good, you'll likely find it back in the released version a couple of versions later.
Hah! :-) Because I'm no longer a coder... and I never programmed in Perl (except a bit, with external hand-holding), nor in Linux. Plus, I don't really know how SA works: I haven't seen a howto or full documentation. True, I haven't searched hard for it, as my browsing time is limited (modem + pay per minute). I'll have a look and try to find out who to email to. - -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFCuv6ttTMYHG2NR9URAnbHAJ4wqX6WQeRDuqQLkYqEq7gygPAlSwCeNPzx uONZ1Rg8MYw1q2LviBxngYw= =R5zx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----