Yes. Thats right. But.. 217.x.x.y Internet --- [ cisco router ] -----------------+ eth0 217.x.x.x |192.168.0.254 [linux box] [switch] --------------------+ eth1 192.168.0.1/24 | Several LANs including 192.168.1.0/24 for example... Linux box dont need to route outside LAN. It must use specified GW for route other LAN networks. If I use YAST to add rotes it works strange. Manual adding route like: route add -net 192.168.1.0/24 gw 192.168.0.254 works! [censored]! Still [censored] with yast and its environment to keep reached configuration :-) Next step will be adding dynamic routing driven by cisco :-( Sergei Keler General DataComm IT-manager tel.: +7(812)325-1085 fax: +7(812)325-1086 On 22.11.2005, at 17:38, Dana Hudes wrote:
192.168.0.254 is a legitimate RFC1918 address. Its not publicly routable but its fine to use behind a proxy or NAT gateway in a private network.
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Dirk Schreiner wrote:
Hi*,
anyway there will never be a net 192.168.0.254/24.
Syv Ritch wrote:
Sergei Keler wrote:
Next, what you recommend as linux implementation of Cosco's EIGRP? Ciscos use EiGRP to keep routes between them using 192.168.0.254/24 net.
1. EIGRP is proprietary to Cisco, and only runs on Cisco gear. 2. There is nothing in EIGRP that "keep routes between them using 192.168.0.254/24 net". For a simplified explanation of EIGRP: [...]
Dirk
TRIA IT-consulting GmbH Joseph-Wild-Straße 20 81829 München Germany Tel: +49 (89) 92907-0 Fax: +49 (89) 92907-100 http://www.tria.de
Registergericht München HRB 113466 USt.-IdNr. DE 180017238 Steuer-Nr. 802/40600 Geschäftsführer: Richard Hofbauer kaufm. Geschäftsleitung: Rosa Igl-------------------------------------------------------- Nachricht von: Dirk.Schreiner@tria.de Nachricht an: suse@911networks.com, skiller@gdc.ru, suse- security@suse.com # Dateianhänge: 0
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com Security-related bug reports go to security@suse.de, not here