Hi I am not sure but should FW_DEV_EXT="eth0" not be FW_DEV_EXT="ppp0" I do not use the SuSEFW2. Ian Miguel Albuquerque <mfoacs@e-workshop.ch> schrieb am 16.03.2003, 16:13:54:
Hi all,
I've set up SuSEFW2(8.0) as fallows :
FW_DEV_EXT="eth0" FW_DEV_INT="eth1" FW_ROUTE="yes" FW_MASQUERADE="yes" FW_MASQ_NETS="192.168.0.0/24" FW_SERVICE_DHCPD="yes" FW_SERVICE_SAMBA="yes"
Other features are unchanged or default.
The clients got an IP address from the dhcp but they can't access the samba services or internet. If I disable one of the interfaces, everything works fine. Now i'm not sure if this is an FW issue. I've changed the eth1 thinking it was problematic but still nothing. The server is an Dell PowerEdge 2600SC, eth0 is integrated.
Any ideas?
Thanx
-- >
.-. e-SecureNet /v\ We Run SuSE Project Manager // \\ *The LINUX Experts* c/o Miguel Albuquerque /( )\ Av. Miremont 46 ^^-^^ 1202 - GE, SWITZERLAND NATEL +41 79 543 1935 http://counter.li.org Linux user #301007 mailto:mfoacs@e-workshop.ch http://mfoacs.e-workshop.ch ----------------------------------------------------------------
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com Security-related bug reports go to security@suse.de, not here