On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:23:25PM +0100, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
I'd like to generate the following packages for Ruby 2.1
1. ruby-2.1 This would provide binaries (ruby, irb, rake, gem, ...) and a minimal set of documentation (changelog, readme, news, ...)
2. libruby2 This would only provide the libruby2.1.so.2.0.0 shared library
3. ruby-stdlib This would provide the /usr/lib64/ruby/2.1.0/ directory tree.
Which use case needs 1+2+3 separated?
4. ruby-doc This would provide the full Ruby documentation including samples.
5. ruby-macros ? This would be a new name for ruby-common, a package only used for building ruby GEM packages. Actually, I'm not happy about the name. It should reflect the package usage. ruby-devel-build or ruby-build-macros could be alternatives.
6. ruby-devel, ruby-devel-extra, ruby-doc-ri These would stay unchanged. -- Martin Vidner, Cloud & Systems Management Team http://en.opensuse.org/User:Mvidner
Kuracke oddeleni v restauraci je jako fekalni oddeleni v bazenu